Audi Q5 Vs Volvo Xc60 Safety Rating Free Updated
Audi Q5 Vs Volvo Xc60 Safety Rating Free Updated
Skip to ContentSkip to Footer
Volvo XC60 vs Audi Q5 vs Mercedes GLC
Cool new Volvo XC60 aims to hit the heights of the larger, 7-seat XC90 SUV. We see how it fares against the Audi Q5 and Mercedes GLC
The previous XC60 was one of Volvo's biggest-selling cars, and actually saw growing sales in the last years of its life – where most models will slowly decline.
That highlights the continuing growth in popularity of premium SUVs, as buyers line up to get into family cars offering loads of space, chic styling and plush interiors packed with tech and efficient engines. Just bosses haven't taken those sales for granted, and accept launched an all-new XC60 on the advanced SPA large automobile platform. That means the car also offers hybrid ability, although for now nigh buyers volition go for a diesel model.
• Best 4x4s and SUVs on sale correct now
Nosotros've lined upwards the Mk2 XC60'southward key rivals, the Mercedes GLC and Audi Q5, to see if the Swedish newcomer has what information technology takes to beat the Germans. All three cars are aimed at drivers looking for condolement, convenience and avant-garde, howdy-tech features rather than pure driving thrills.
The ageing approachable XC60 was a little behind on technology, style and interior quality, but Volvo has been working hard on those areas with the new car – so can it take the win here?
Volvo XC60
| Model: | Volvo XC60 D4 AWD R-Pattern |
| Price: | £39,705 |
| Engine: | 2.0-litre 4cyl turbodiesel |
| Power: | 187bhp |
| 0-60mph: | 9.0 seconds |
| Test economy: | 39.4mpg/8.7mpl |
| CO2: | 136g/km |
| Annual road tax: | £140 |
The Volvo XC60 is offered in three main trim levels – Momentum, Inscription and R-Design – although all take a 'Pro' variant aimed at armada buyers. Our pictures evidence a Momentum model, simply we test the sportier R-Design with the brand'due south D4 diesel engine, which costs £39,705.
More reviews
Bumpy British roads provide a tough test for cars similar these, only the XC60 tackles this sort of tarmac with a respectable level of composure.
In the pause's Comfort fashion, body control is good, keeping the machine stable but offering plenty movement to assist comfort. However, you will notice big bumps in the road surface on torn country lanes, especially when cornering every bit the suspension is loaded up.Hither the XC60 feels more jittery and unsettled, only around town and on the throughway the Volvo delivers a decent level of refinement, even if information technology still isn't as quiet as the GLC.
None of our trio is specially sporty, but the XC60 does have quick, light steering and lots of grip. It feels more than active than the GLC, but the Mercedes' steering is heavier and gives the machine a more solid feel.
The 2.0-litre D4 diesel matches the Audi's 187bhp, although it falls slightly backside the GLC 250 d'due south 201bhp figure. Information technology was the slowest car in our acceleration tests at the track; the Volvo sprinted from 0-60mph in nine seconds flat, which lagged backside the lighter Audi's 8.two-second fourth dimension.
The gap was closed during our 30-70mph in-gear acceleration test, where the XC60 took merely 8.3 seconds; two tenths longer than the Audi. The more powerful GLC was more than than a 2d quicker.
All of our cars take plenty of power, though, and you lot don't demand to rev them likewise difficult to make progress. If you lot do, the Volvo'south refinement only starts to suspension down at higher revs, where a diesel fuel drone comes through in the cabin. Go on a chapeau on this and the 8-speed motorcar manages the engine'southward revs well, irresolute smoothly and kicking down speedily with decent response if you need a outburst of acceleration.
Testers' notes: "The Q5's appeal is in its classy cabin that packs plenty of tech – even if a lot of this is optional. We'd accept liked to try a car on air suspension to see how it compared here."
Audi Q5
| Model: | Audi Q5 2.0 TDI quattro S line S tronic |
| Cost: | £41,085 |
| Engine: | two.0-litre 4cyl turbodiesel |
| Power: | 187bhp |
| 0-60mph: | eight.2 seconds |
| Examination economy: | 38.3mpg/8.4mpl |
| CO2: | 133g/km |
| Annual road tax: | £450 |
The latest Audi Q5 arrived in the Great britain earlier this yr, and just like the XC60 information technology features a new platform designed to deliver better refinement and more quality than the car information technology replaced. Here we test the £41,085 2.0 TDI South line model.
The Audi's iv-cylinder two.0-litre diesel is closely matched with the Volvo's, as it produces the same 187bhp and 400Nm of torque. Simply both are a chip behind the Mercedes' more than powerful 2.1-litre.
The engine is placidity and doesn't need to be revved hard to get the best out of information technology, especially equally the torque spread is the widest of all three cars: that 400Nm maximum is available from 1,750 to 3,000rpm.
Information technology's quicker than the Volvo, too, and our tests showed that information technology covered 0-60mph eight tenths faster than the XC60. It trailed the punchier Mercedes past a few tenths, though, posting a fourth dimension of viii.two seconds.
The Audi's weight advantage over the other cars on examination should mean that information technology's more than agile – only while that'southward true to some extent, it's still not the Q5's strongest bespeak considering the steering is as well vague. In that location'southward lots of grip, merely although the ride is on the firm side, damping bumps in fast bends with more than control than the Volvo, information technology lacks both rivals' softer, more than equanimous edge on smoother, flowing surfaces.
Still, it is quiet on the motion. A more unsettled ride at college speed means it's not equally comfortable as the XC60 or GLC over longer distances – although larger wheels on higher-spec cars affect this less than on the Volvo.
Testers' notes: "The Q5'south appeal is in its classy motel that packs plenty of tech – even if a lot of this is optional. We'd have liked to endeavor a car on air intermission to come across how it compared here."
Mercedes GLC
| Model: | Mercedes GLC 250 d 4MATIC AMG Line |
| Price: | £41,070 |
| Engine: | ii.1-litre 4cyl turbodiesel |
| Ability: | 201bhp |
| 0-60mph: | vii.9 seconds |
| Examination economy: | 37.7mpg/8.4mpl |
| CO2: | 129g/km |
| Annual route tax: | £450 |
The Mercedes GLC is available with 2 four-cylinder diesels: the 168bhp 220 d and this 201bhp 250 d. It's more powerful than the Volvo XC60 D4 and Audi Q5 2.0 TDI, and in AMG Line trim it costs £41,070.
Thank you to its air intermission system'due south softer gear up-upwards, the Mercedes is the most comfortable auto of the three on test hither, reacting to bumps in the route with more fluidity than the XC60 or firmer Q5.
Body command is on the looser side, however, but this means where the Volvo and Audi transmit some harshness through to the passenger compartment over the worst surfaces, the Mercedes filters out more nasty wheel move.
However, fifty-fifty in Sport+ mode, which stiffens up the chassis settings, the GLC'southward set up-upward is notwithstanding the softest, which allows more than curlicue through corners.
It ways the Mercedes is the least agile selection, while the steering is besides the heaviest, and in this setting y'all lose the languid ride but don't gain much else. This trait at to the lowest degree makes it extremely comfortable on the motorway, only plow off on to a state road and you won't be able to proceed pace with the Volvo or Audi, which feel sportier.
The GLC offers the strongest straight-line performance hither. With 201bhp it'due south a footling more powerful than its rivals, but the extra 100Nm of torque bachelor lower down in the rev range ways it feels more muscular and was quicker on test.
It took vii.2 seconds to become from 30-70mph through the gears, which is nearly a second quicker than its rivals here, but in gear it's much closer. It accelerated between 50 and 70mph in five.8 and 7.ii seconds in 6th and seventh gears respectively.
Mercedes' ix-speed automobile box is also a great performer, shifting very smoothly in normal driving, even if it tin can't match the dual-clutch Audi in manual mode. Just it'due south the smoothest set-up hither, and the extra ratio over its competition helps when cruising, where the noisier diesel fuel'south revs are lower.
Testers' notes: "Mercedes offers a £495 off-route pack, just only on Sport models. The Audi and Volvo are fitted with equipment such equally hill descent control every bit standard."
Verdict
First place: Volvo XC60
The Volvo earns the win with its kit, price and blend of comfort and performance, although the margin of victory isn't big. Information technology's great value and will exist the cheapest machine of this trio to run, yet it doesn't sacrifice quality. It's also fast plenty and nicely refined, while the chassis and steering offer good agility. The XC60 follows on from the XC90, offering enough of all-round entreatment for a family SUV.
2d place: Mercedes GLC
While the GLC is easily the about comfy model here, information technology doesn't handle every bit well every bit the XC60 or Q5 and is showing its age. Information technology'south refined and surprisingly quick, while there's plenty of space, simply it lacks the more modern cabin and tech of its rivals. Stiff efficiency helps its example, although buyers need more than innovation in this sector, and it's here where the Mercedes is found wanting.
Third place: Audi Q5
The margins in this class are extremely tight. While there's no faulting the Q5 when information technology comes to quality or engineering, and the auto's agility and operation are certainly impressive, it simply isn't equally comfortable every bit the contest, which matters more hither. The Audi will resist depreciation well, only PCP deals mean this is less important, while information technology features less standard kit than the XC60, too.
Other options in this category...
Jaguar F-Pace
Model: Jaguar F-Footstep 2.0d 180 R-Sport Price: £41,330Engine: 2.0-litre 4cyl, 178bhp
The F-Pace is the commuter'southward SUV. It'south more agile and responsive than any of our contenders, and while it's also a little more expensive, it's still very applied, with an even larger 650-litre kicking.
Land Rover Discovery Sport
Model: Land Rover Discovery Sport TD4 HSEPrice: £40,140Engine: 2.0-litre 4cyl, 178bhp
Country Rover is synonomous with luxury SUVs, and the Discovery Sport offers versatility and upmarket appeal. Thanks to its 5+2 seating layout it's extremely practical and offers something different compared with these 4x4s.
Figures
| Volvo XC60 D4 AWD R-Design | Mercedes GLC 250 d 4MATIC AMG Line | Audi Q5 2.0 TDI quattro Southward line S tronic | |
| On the road price/total every bit tested | £39,705/£50,730 | £41,070/£49,085 | £41,085/£45,210 |
| Residual value (after 3yrs/36,000) | £21,000/52.9% | £21,599/52.6% | £22,626/55.one% |
| Depreciation | £18,705 | £19,471 | £18,459 |
| Annual revenue enhancement liability std/higher rate | £2,288/£4,576 | £2,206/£4,412 | £2,286/£iv,573 |
| Annual fuel toll (12k/20k miles) | £1,620/£2,700 | £one,693/£two,822 | £one,666/£2,777 |
| Insurance group/quote/route taxation cost | 31/£828/£140 | 34/£i,191/£450 | 29/£848/£450 |
| Toll of 1st/2nd/3rd service | £295/£430/£370 | £35 per month (3yrs) | £266/£471/£319 |
| Length/wheelbase | iv,688/ii,865mm | 4,656/2,873mm | 4,663/2,819mm |
| Height/width | one,658/1,999mm | 1,639/one,890mm | 1,659/1,893mm |
| Engine | 4cyl in-line/1,969cc | 4cyl in-line/2,143cc | 4cyl in-line/one,968cc |
| Height ability/revs | 187bhp/four,250rpm | 201bhp/3,800rpm | 187bhp/iii,800rpm |
| Summit torque/revs | 400Nm/1,750-two,500rpm | 500Nm/ane,600-one,800rpm | 400Nm/i,750-3,000rpm |
| Transmission | 8-spd motorcar/4wd | nine-spd auto/4wd | vii-spd dual-clutch/4wd |
| Fuel tank capacity/spare cycle | 60 litres/£150 | l litres/sealant kit | 65 litres/£175 |
| Kick capacity (seats upward/down) | 505/ane,432 litres | 550/1,600 litres | 550/1,550 litres |
| Kerbweight/payload/towing weight | 1,802/664/2,400kg | 1,845/655/2,500kg | 1,770/670/ii,400kg |
| Turning circle/drag coefficient | eleven.4 metres/0.32Cd | 11.viii metres/0.32Cd | 11.seven metres/0.26Cd |
| Basic warranty (miles)/recovery | 3yrs (60,000)/3yrs | 3yrs (unltd)/30yrs | 3yrs (60,000)/3yrs |
| Service intervals/Britain dealers | 18,000 miles (1yr)/192 | 15,500 miles (1yr)/147 | Variable/118 |
| Commuter Power manufacturer/dealer pos. | 7th/16th | 21st/12th | 18th/15th |
| NCAP: Adult/child/ped./assist/stars | Northward/A | 95/89/82/71/5 | 93/86/73/58/5 |
| 0-sixty/30-70mph | nine.0/8.iii secs | vii.9/7.ii secs | viii.2/viii.i secs |
| 30-50mph in 3rd/4th | 3.5/4.vi secs | 2.vii/3.3 secs | N/A/3.three secs |
| 50-70mph in fifth/sixth/7th/8th | 5.ix/6.nine/nine.3/12.5 secs | 5.3/five.8/7.2/10.5 secs | v.1/viii.7/18.6s/North/A |
| Summit speed/rpm at 70mph | 127mph/1,900rpm | 138mph/1,500rpm | 135mph/one,600rpm |
| Braking 70-0/sixty-0/30-0mph | 53.0/36.4/11.5m | 52.6/42.2/13.3m | 47.8/33.0/nine.7m |
| Noise outside/idle/xxx/70mph | 51/72/62/70dB | 76/52/62/71dB | 51/69/62/68dB |
| Auto Express econ (mpg/mpl)/range | 39.4/8.seven/520 miles | 37.7/viii.4/415 miles | 38.3/8.four/548 miles |
| Govt urban/extra-urban/combined | 48.7/58.9/54.3mpg | 51.4/60.1/56.5mpg | 52.3/57.6/55.4mpg |
| Govt urban/extra-urban/combined | 10.7/thirteen.0/11.9mpl | 11.3/13.2/12.4mpl | eleven.5/12.7/12.2mpl |
| Actual/claimed CO2/revenue enhancement bracket | 192/136g/km/29% | 201/129g/km/27% | 198/133g/km/28% |
| Airbags/Isofix/park sensors/camera | Seven/yes/yes/£375 | Seven/yeah/aye/yeah | Vi/yes/yes/£450 |
| Auto box/stability/cruise command/AEB | Yes/yes/yeah/aye | Yes/yes/yes/yep | Yep/yes/yes/yes |
| Climate control/leather/heated seats | Yep/yeah/yep | Yes/£795/yep | Yes/yes/yep |
| Met paint/LED lights/keyless entry & go | £650/yes/yeah | £685/yes/yes | £645/yes/aye |
| Sat-nav/USB/DAB radio/Bluetooth | Yes/yeah/yes/yes | Yes/aye/yes/yeah | Yes/yes/yes/yes |
Nigh Popular
New Volkswagen ID.Fizz prototype review
New Volkswagen ID.Buzz image review
With the new VW ID.Fizz gear up to be revealed in March, we striking the road in a prototype version and find there is plenty to be excited about
20 Feb 2022
Audi Q8 55 TFSI eastward vs Range Rover Sport P400e: 2022 twin exam review
Audi Q8 55 TFSI eastward vs Range Rover Sport P400e: 2022 twin examination review
Can plug-in hybrids make full the void left by diesel? Nosotros exam PHEV versions of the Audi Q8 and Range Rover Sport to find out
19 February 2022
New 2022 Range Rover Sport volition become all-electric variant
New 2022 Range Rover Sport will go all-electric variant
Next-generation Range Rover Sport is cartoon nearly and we can look BMW M ability and pure electric powertrains
17 Feb 2022
Skip to HeaderSkip to Content
DOWNLOAD HERE
Audi Q5 Vs Volvo Xc60 Safety Rating Free Updated
Posted by: sanbornfreand.blogspot.com
0 Response to "Audi Q5 Vs Volvo Xc60 Safety Rating Free Updated"
Post a Comment